My Cyber Insurance Conversation with ChatGPT

I was at a happy hour yesterday and had a very interesting conversation regarding Cyber Insurance.  I had a two hour drive home so I decided to play with the new conversation feature in ChatGPT.  Here’s what ChatGPT had to say about the subject.

‍

Q: I have a question. I am wondering, what are the typical premiums, if I was a Fortune 500 CIO, what premiums could I expect to pay for my cyber insurance?

‍

A: Cyber insurance premiums can vary widely based on several factors, including the size of the company, the industry, the company's annual revenue, the amount and type of coverage, and the company's security posture and history of cyber incidents.

‍

For a Fortune 500 company, premiums can range significantly. Generally, large corporations might expect to pay anywhere from several hundred thousand to several million dollars annually for comprehensive cyber insurance coverage. For example, premiums could range from $500,000 to $10 million per year, depending on the coverage limits and the specific risks involved.

‍

To get a more accurate estimate, companies typically work with insurance brokers who specialize in cyber insurance. They assess the company's risk profile, review existing security measures, and determine the appropriate level of coverage and corresponding premiums.

‍

Q: What is the typical deductible for a policy like that?

‍

A: For large corporations like those in the Fortune 500, cyber insurance deductibles can also vary widely based on the specifics of the policy and the assessed risk. Typically, deductibles for comprehensive cyber insurance policies for such companies might range from $100,000 to $1 million or more.

‍

The exact deductible amount will depend on factors such as the extent of coverage, the company's risk profile, and the negotiated terms of the policy. Higher deductibles often lead to lower premium costs, while lower deductibles can result in higher premiums. The insurance broker and underwriter will work with the company to tailor the deductible and coverage to match the company's needs and risk tolerance.

‍

Q: If I could prove a significant reduction in the risk profile, what kind of discounts do you think I could get on my premiums, and what do you think is the likelihood that a breach causes damage?

‍

A: If your company can significantly prove a reduction in a client's risk profile through robust data security posture management, it could potentially lead to substantial discounts on their cyber insurance premiums. Insurers typically offer discounts for demonstrated improvements in security measures and reduced risk exposure. These discounts can range from 10% to 30% or more, depending on the insurer and the specific improvements made.

‍

Regarding the likelihood of a breach causing damage, improved data security posture can significantly lower this risk. While it is difficult to provide exact probabilities, companies with strong security measures and proactive risk management strategies are generally much less likely to experience damaging breaches. Insurers take this into account when assessing premiums and coverage terms.

‍

To summarize, demonstrating a significant reduction in risk profile could lead to notable discounts on premiums and a lower likelihood of a breach causing damage, enhancing both security and cost-effectiveness for the client.

‍

Q: You mentioned that getting a discount of 10%-30% or more might be possible. Are you able to cite any sources to defend that statement?

‍

A: Certainly! Here are some sources and examples to support the statement that implementing robust cybersecurity measures can lead to significant discounts on cyber insurance premiums, typically ranging from 10% to 30% or more:

‍

Industry Reports and Studies

‍

1. Marsh & McLennan Cyber Insurance Market Report: Marsh, a leading insurance broker, has reported that companies implementing strong cybersecurity measures can receive premium discounts. According to their insights, companies that demonstrate robust cybersecurity practices, including data protection measures and incident response plans, can often secure discounts on their cyber insurance premiums.

‍

2. Ponemon Institute's Cost of Data Breach Report: The Ponemon Institute, in collaboration with IBM Security, publishes an annual report on the cost of data breaches. This report highlights that organizations with proactive cybersecurity measures, such as comprehensive data inventory and classification, can reduce the financial impact of data breaches, which is often reflected in lower insurance premiums.

‍

3. Advisen Cyber Risk Network: Advisen, a data provider for the insurance industry, has indicated that insurers often offer discounts to organizations that have implemented effective cybersecurity controls. Their studies suggest that premium discounts can range from 10% to 30%, depending on the level of security measures in place.

‍

Real-World Examples

‍

1. Coalition Insurance: Coalition, a cyber insurance provider, offers premium credits and discounts for organizations that adopt specific cybersecurity practices and technologies. They have reported that clients who use advanced security tools and adhere to best practices can receive significant premium reductions.

‍

2. AXA XL Cyber Insurance: AXA XL, another major player in the cyber insurance market, provides incentives for companies that implement strong cybersecurity frameworks. They offer premium discounts for businesses that demonstrate effective risk management and cybersecurity controls.

‍

Insurance Industry Insights

‍

1. Deloitte's Cyber Insurance Insights: Deloitte's research on cyber insurance indicates that underwriters increasingly consider the cybersecurity posture of organizations when determining premiums. They note that companies with comprehensive cybersecurity programs, including regular audits and incident response plans, can often secure substantial premium discounts.

‍

2. Munich Re's Cyber Insurance Report: Munich Re, a leading reinsurer, emphasizes the importance of cybersecurity in their underwriting process. Their reports suggest that businesses with robust cybersecurity measures can benefit from lower premiums, as these measures reduce the likelihood and impact of cyber incidents.

‍

The availability of premium discounts for implementing strong cybersecurity measures is well-documented in industry reports, studies, and real-world examples. These sources support the assertion that businesses can achieve discounts typically ranging from 10% to 30% or more by demonstrating a proactive approach to cybersecurity. This highlights the financial incentives for organizations to invest in robust data security posture management solutions and practices.

‍

Q: So let’s assume a breach has occurred and I have a deductible of $1 million and let's say the damages from the breach are expected to be maybe $1.5 million, would you recommend that I make the claim or eat the extra half a million dollars?

‍

A: That depends on several factors, including the specifics of your policy, your company's financial situation, and the potential long-term impacts of making a claim.

‍

Here are some considerations:

‍

1. Future Premiums: Making a claim might increase your future premiums. Insurers often adjust premiums based on claims history, so even though you might receive $500,000 from the claim, your premiums could rise, costing more in the long run.

‍

2. Policy Terms: Review your policy terms to see if there are any conditions or clauses that might affect future coverage or premiums when claims are made.

‍

3. Financial Impact: Evaluate whether paying the extra $500,000 out-of-pocket is feasible for your company without significantly impacting operations or financial health.

‍

4. Reputation and Trust: Consider the potential reputational impact. Some companies might prefer to handle smaller breaches internally to avoid public disclosure and maintain customer trust.

‍

5. Legal and Contractual Obligations: Check if there are any legal or contractual obligations to report the breach and make a claim, which could influence your decision.

‍

In general, if the financial impact of not making the claim is manageable and you want to avoid higher premiums or other potential long-term impacts, you might consider covering the additional $500,000 yourself. However, if making the claim would provide necessary financial relief without severely impacting future costs, it might be worth it. Consulting with a financial advisor or risk management expert could provide more tailored advice.

‍

Q: Again, let's say I do have a breach and the breach is going to cost me two million dollars.  If I decide to make a claim, can I expect my insurance company to investigate me to ensure it wasn't negligence on my part?

‍

A: Yes, you can expect your insurance company to conduct an investigation following a claim, especially one involving a significant breach costing two million dollars. Insurers typically investigate to:

‍

1. Assess the Claim: Verify the validity and details of the claim to ensure the costs are accurate and justified.
2. Determine Negligence: Evaluate whether the breach resulted from negligence or failure to follow required security measures and protocols, which might affect coverage.
3. Understand the Incident: Gain insights into how the breach occurred and assess the overall risk environment to adjust future premiums and policies.

‍

The investigation process may involve reviewing your company's security policies, incident response procedures, and compliance with the terms of your insurance policy. Cooperation and transparency during this process are crucial to ensure a smooth claim settlement. If negligence is found, it could impact the coverage or result in denied claims. However, if your company has strong security measures and can demonstrate due diligence, the claim is more likely to be processed without issues.

‍

Q: So let's just say that it is, my insurance company is claiming that it is negligence. It stands to reason that I'm going to have significant legal costs of my own now, correct?

‍

A: Yes, if your insurance company determines that negligence was a factor in the breach, it could lead to significant legal costs for your company. Here’s why:

‍

1. Dispute Resolution: You may need legal representation to dispute the insurer’s finding of negligence if you believe it’s not justified. This can involve negotiations, arbitration, or even litigation.

‍

2. Coverage Denial: If the insurer denies the claim based on negligence, you might need to cover the costs of the breach yourself, leading to potential lawsuits from affected parties, requiring further legal expenses.

‍

3. Regulatory and Compliance Issues: Depending on the nature of the breach, you could face investigations and fines from regulatory bodies, adding to your legal costs.

‍

4. Third-Party Claims: If third parties (such as clients or partners) are affected by the breach, they might pursue legal action against your company for damages, necessitating additional legal defense.

‍

Given these potential costs, it’s important to:

• Ensure robust security measures and compliance with industry standards to minimize the risk of negligence claims.
• Maintain detailed documentation of your security practices and breach response efforts.
• Consult with legal and cybersecurity experts to strengthen your defense and prepare for potential disputes with your insurer.

‍

Having strong legal support can help manage these challenges and protect your company’s interests in the event of a breach.

‍

Q: What if I didn’t have a full inventory of all of the cloud data stores?

‍

A: Not having a full inventory of your cloud data stores can significantly increase the risk of a breach and complicate any insurance claims. Here's how this could impact your situation:

‍

1. Increased Risk of Breach: Without a complete inventory, you might overlook vulnerabilities, leading to higher chances of unauthorized access, data loss, or other security incidents.

‍

2. Compliance Issues: Many regulations require businesses to maintain detailed records of where sensitive data is stored. Failing to do so can result in compliance violations and potential fines.

‍

3. Negligence Claims: If a breach occurs and it is found that your company didn't maintain a full inventory of cloud data stores, the insurer could argue negligence. This might lead to denial of the claim or reduced coverage.

‍

4. Difficulty in Incident Response: An incomplete inventory makes it harder to quickly identify and respond to security incidents, potentially exacerbating the impact and costs of a breach.

‍

5. Legal and Financial Consequences: Lack of a comprehensive inventory can lead to significant legal costs if the insurer denies the claim based on negligence. Additionally, the financial impact of covering breach-related costs out-of-pocket can be substantial.

‍

To mitigate these risks, it’s crucial to:

• Implement robust data inventory and management practices.
• Regularly audit and update your cloud data stores.
• Ensure compliance with relevant regulations and industry standards.

‍

Proactively managing your cloud data inventory not only strengthens your security posture but also supports a more favorable outcome in the event of an insurance claim.

‍

Q: What about if I didn't know where I had sensitive data? Would that matter if I didn't know all the locations of my sensitive data?

‍

A: Yes, not knowing where sensitive data is located within your organization can have significant implications, especially in the context of cybersecurity and compliance:

‍

1. Increased Security Risk: Lack of awareness about the locations of sensitive data makes it difficult to implement adequate security measures to protect it. This increases the risk of unauthorized access, data breaches, and other security incidents.

‍

2. Compliance and Regulatory Issues: Many data protection regulations (such as GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA) require organizations to know where sensitive data is stored and to implement appropriate security measures. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in fines and other penalties.

‍

3. Impact on Incident Response: In the event of a security incident or breach, not knowing where sensitive data resides complicates the incident response process. This can delay detection and containment efforts, potentially increasing the severity and costs of the incident.

‍

4. Insurance Coverage: Insurers may consider lack of knowledge about data locations as a form of negligence, potentially impacting coverage or leading to disputes during the claims process.

‍

To address these challenges, it's crucial to:

• Conduct regular data discovery and classification exercises to identify and categorize sensitive data.
• Implement robust data governance and management practices to maintain an accurate inventory of data locations.
• Ensure compliance with data protection regulations by documenting where sensitive data is stored and applying appropriate security controls.

‍

By proactively managing and documenting your sensitive data locations, you can strengthen your overall data security posture, enhance compliance readiness, and mitigate potential risks associated with data breaches and insurance claims.

‍

Q: Let's assume I'm working for a fairly large enterprise of 30K employees and there was a sharepoint site that had "organization read access" enabled and inside of that sharepoint site was 25.2M SSN records. If that data was to be exfiltrated by a bad actor would that be considered negligence?

‍

A: Yes, the situation where a SharePoint site containing 25.2 million SSN records was accessible to all 30,000 employees would likely be construed as negligence. Here's why and what that could mean for your cyber insurance claim:

‍

Why It Could Be Construed as Negligence

1. Excessive Access Permissions: Granting organization-wide read access to sensitive data like SSNs without restricting it to only those employees who need access to perform their job functions violates the principle of least privilege.

‍

2. Failure to Implement Adequate Controls: Not having proper access controls and data governance policies in place to protect such sensitive information is generally seen as a lapse in due diligence.

‍

3. Regulatory Compliance: Most data protection regulations require organizations to implement stringent measures to protect sensitive data. Failure to do so can be seen as non-compliance.

‍

Potential Impact on Cyber Insurance Claim

1. Claim Denial or Reduction: Insurers might deny the claim or significantly reduce the payout if they determine that the breach resulted from negligence. They may argue that the organization did not take reasonable steps to protect sensitive data.

‍

2. Investigation and Legal Costs: The insurer will likely conduct a thorough investigation to determine the cause of the breach. If negligence is found, you may face additional legal costs to dispute the insurer's findings or to manage any resulting litigation.

‍

Mitigating Actions

1. Immediate Remediation:some text
   1. Immediately address the access control issue by restricting access to sensitive data based on job roles and responsibilities.
   2. Conduct a thorough review of all data access permissions and implement the principle of least privilege.

‍

2. Strengthen Security Practices:some text
   1. Implement comprehensive data governance policies.
   2. Regularly audit data access and storage practices to ensure compliance with best practices and regulatory requirements.

‍

3. Prepare Documentation:some text
   1. Document all security measures and steps taken to secure sensitive data.
   2. Maintain records of your incident response efforts and cooperation with the insurer.

‍

4. Engage Legal Counsel:some text
   1. Consult with legal experts to understand your position and prepare for potential disputes with the insurer.
   2. Legal counsel can also assist in responding to regulatory inquiries and managing any resulting litigation.

‍

Long-Term Strategies

1. Regular Training: Provide ongoing training to employees on data security best practices and the importance of protecting sensitive information.

‍

2. Incident Response Planning: Develop and regularly update your incident response plan to ensure a swift and effective response to any data breaches.

‍

3. Continuous Monitoring: Implement continuous monitoring and automated alerting for any unauthorized access to sensitive data.

‍

Conclusion

While the situation you described could be seen as negligence, taking immediate and proactive steps to remediate the issue, strengthen security practices, and engage with legal counsel can help manage the situation and support your cyber insurance claim. Moving forward, implementing robust data governance and security measures will be crucial to prevent similar issues and demonstrate due diligence to insurers and regulators.

‍

Q: Sounds like people should just buy Cyera and get a handle on their data security posture management?

‍

A: Investing in a robust data security posture management solution like Cyera can indeed help organizations manage their data security more effectively and mitigate the risks associated with data breaches. Here’s how such a solution can be beneficial:

‍

Benefits of Using Cyera for Data Security Posture Management

‍

1. Comprehensive Data Inventory:some text
   1. Visibility: Gain complete visibility into where sensitive data is stored across cloud and on-premises environments.
   2. Classification: Automatically classify data based on sensitivity and compliance requirements.

‍

2. Access Control:some text
   1. Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that access to sensitive data is restricted to only those who need it, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
   2. Role-Based Access Control: Implement and manage role-based access controls to enforce security policies.

‍

3. Real-Time Monitoringsome text
   1. Threat Detection: Continuously monitor for unusual or suspicious activity that could indicate a potential breach.
   2. Alerts and Notifications: Receive real-time alerts and notifications to respond promptly to security incidents.

‍

4. Compliance Management:some text
   1. Regulatory Compliance: Help ensure compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and others.
   2. Audit Readiness: Maintain detailed logs and reports to facilitate audits and demonstrate compliance.

‍

5. Risk Assessment:some text
   1. Vulnerability Identification: Identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk, allowing for targeted remediation efforts.
   2. Automated Assessments: Use automated tools to regularly assess and update the security posture.

‍

6. Incident Response:some text
   1. Preparedness: Develop and refine incident response plans based on insights gained from the security posture management system.
   2. Forensic Analysis: Provide detailed data for forensic analysis in the event of a breach.

‍

7. Data Protection:some text
   1. Encryption: Ensure that sensitive data is encrypted both at rest and in transit.
   2. Data Masking: Implement data masking techniques to protect sensitive information.

‍

Why Cyera?

Cyera specializes in providing comprehensive solutions for data security posture management, offering a range of features designed to help organizations protect their sensitive data and comply with regulatory requirements. By leveraging Cyera’s platform, organizations can:

‍

• Reduce the risk of data breaches and associated costs.
• Enhance their ability to comply with data protection laws.
• Improve overall security posture and resilience against cyber threats.
• Gain actionable insights to make informed decisions about data security.

‍

Conclusion

Investing in a solution like Cyera for data security posture management can significantly enhance an organization's ability to protect sensitive data, comply with regulations, and mitigate the risks associated with data breaches. By implementing robust data security measures, organizations can not only protect themselves from potential breaches but also reduce the likelihood of facing severe legal, financial, and reputational consequences.

‍

Thank you, ChatGPT :)